Rant: high sounding language unsupported by dignity of thought - Samuel Johnson

Friday 11 February 2011

Rules for writers

(Copied from an ancient, cobwebby, typewritten set of rules that an ancient, cobwebby, old sub gave me when I started work as a trainee journalist in nineteen canteen. Some of them still apply, though!)

1. Verbs has to agree with their subjects.
2. Prepositions are not words to end sentences with.
3. And don't start a sentence with a conjunction.
4. It is wrong to ever split an infinitive.
5. Avoid clichés like the plague. (They're old hat.)
6. Also, always avoid annoying alliteration.
7. Be more or less specific.
8. Parenthetical remarks (however relevant) are (usually) unnecessary.
9. Also, in addition, never, ever use repetitive redundancies.
10. No sentence fragments.
11. Contractions aren't necessary and shouldn't be used.
12. Foreign words and phrases are not apropos.
13. Do not be redundant; do not use more words than necessary; it's highly superfluous.
14. One should NEVER generalise.
15. Comparisons are as bad as clichés.
16. Don't use no double negatives.
17. Eschew ampersands & abbreviations, etc.
18. One-word sentences? Eliminate.
19. Analogies in writing are like feathers on a snake.
20. The passive voice is to be avoided.

The Guardian's excellent Mind Your Language blog and the links within it jogged my memory of these rules.

Monday 7 February 2011

Is Twitter turning us all into stalkers?

I really like Twitter. It's a source of fun, debate, breaking news and general silliness. You can have conversations with like-minded people, join in with word games, and exchange banter with friends, strangers and even celebrities. Or, if you haven't anything to say, you can just sit quietly and enjoy the chat, until you have something to contribute.

Twitter also appeals to the voyeur in all of us. Legitimises it, even. With the click of a button, we get to peek inside the lives and personalities of our favourite celebs of stage, screen, sports field, political arena, etc. Of course, what we see is what the celebs are willing to show us - so that's ok (it's not like we're hacking their phones).

I must confess, I'm beside myself with excitement when a really famous person retweets something I've written or - beyond thrilling - actually addresses a Tweet to me personally! And yes, I sometimes send Tweets to famous people - but I don't expect a reply. It's just a bonus if I get one.

Yet I see so many Tweets from all sorts of people begging celebrities to follow them or to retweet their messages. When it dawns on them that the celeb is not going to cave in to their incessant 160-character haranguing, these desperate individuals resort to pitiful whingeing ("Why won't you just follow me? :-( ") Finally, they complain to the Twitter world in general about what a thoroughly unpleasant person the celeb is, how he/she doesn't respect the fans, etc, etc.

But just because you know what your favourite celeb had for dinner or where he's gone on holiday, it doesn't mean he's your friend. No, you are his FOLLOWER. And it strikes me that in some cases there's a very thin line between follower and STALKER.

Don't clog up our timelines with these "look at me, look at me" type of Tweets. If I was your celebrity victim, I'd block you.

Cheap flights? Don't make me laugh

Dear Auntie and Uncle,

I'm sorry we won't be coming to your Golden Wedding celebration in April. We did try to find flights from the south of England to anywhere in Scotland - and with three months to go we thought we might get flights at a reasonable price.

However, the cheapest available return flight on those dates was more expensive than a week's all-inclusive cruise in the Mediterranean. And it would have involved a stopover in Belfast and a three-hour stop in Manchester.

Lots of love,
Christine

Monday 31 January 2011

Fear and loathing in the dentist's chair, part 2

So, today was the day of the 15-minute follow-up dental appointment after the surprise extraction. Here's how it went:

Dentist: "Our computer's down. Why are you here?"
Chris: "I had a tooth out. You asked me to come back for a follow-up appointment."
Dentist: "Any problems?"
Chris: "Well, the tooth next to the hole is not supported on one side and now my bridge is unstable. I'm a musician, but I can't play until it's fixed. Oh, and I'm in constant pain."
Dentist: "There's nothing we can do about any of that."

Er, basically that was it. I was there for less than five minutes. She didn't even examine my mouth. I tried to clarify what she could do - but she just repeated that she couldn't do anything.

I think I need to change dentists again. Not playing is not an option. Nor is scoffing painkillers. And I'm certainly not going to just sit around waiting for all my teeth to fall out.

Fear and loathing in the dentist's chair, part 1

Like many people of my generation, I suspect, I am petrified of the dentist. This is because, when I was a child in the 1960s and 70s, dentists were sadistic bastards.

I have vivid memories of being held down in the chair by one monster dressed all in green, his face hidden behind a green mask, while another green monster pressed the gas mask to my face. This was to remove my milk teeth so the adult teeth would grow in properly.

On one occasion during my teens, the dentist used a new treatment, called "Twighlight treatment", which gave me an out-of-body experience. Actually, it was fascinating looking over the dentist's shoulder and watching as he gave me a filling. It wasn't so funny watching three people shaking me and shouting at me to wake up.

Despite my fear, I have always managed to attend regular check-ups. I've always done whatever I've been told to look after my teeth. However, I have an inherited condition which (without going into detail) means that I'm basically fighting a losing battle.

I had been seeing a very nice dentist who understood my fears as well as my mouth and was very patient and reasuring. But her surgery is quite far away from both my home and work so 10 days ago, being due a regular check-up, I decided to register with a dentist nearer home.

Being well aware that I needed treatment, I was expecting an initial check-up and perhaps a discussion of my dental history and needs before making a follow-up appointment.

This is what happened:

[Chris walks, trembling slightly, into the surgery.]
Dentist: "Take a seat there."
[Chris sits on the dentist's chair.]
[Dentist tips the chair so patient's head is lower than her feet.]
Chris: [Gripping the sides of the chair in fear of slipping off head-first] "I should warn you, I'm a very nervous patient."
[Dentist says nothing.]
Chris: "I have a loose tooth at the back, which I know will have to come out soon. I've been seeing [a specialist] who has helped me hold on to it for as long as possible."
Dentist: [Feeling the said wobbly tooth] "Yes, that tooth is very loose."
[Dentist gives Chris an injection.]
Chris: [Trembling] "Mmmble mmbble squeak."
Dentist: "Hold still. I have to take this tooth out."
[Chris starts to cry like a scared little girl.]
Dentist's assistant: "Don't worry, she's very good at this."
[Dentist extracts tooth, shoves cotton pad into the hole, gives Chris a leaflet about tooth extraction.]
Dentist: "Make a follow-up appointment. Make it a 15-minute appointment."
[Chris makes the appointment and runs away.]

This woman's lack of empathy, compassion or even good manners has set me back more than 40 years.

Thursday 13 January 2011

Definition of double-Dutch

I'm fluent in many languages (English, American, Scots, the Doric, Deutschlish, Franglais, Swenglish, Anglo Saxon...) but the project I'm working on at the moment has me stumped.

I'm editing a document that was written in Finnish, Google-translated into English and revised by a Swede.

The result is double-Dutch.

Keeping my thoughts to myself

Just found this in the unpublished drafts part of the blog. I've no idea what set me off on this rant - but the sentiments still stand!

I can fight my own battles and I don't want someone else doing it for me. And I always assume that the people I know are able to do the same.

That's not to say I don't sympathise if you've got a problem, or that I won't give you my support and help if you want it - I just won't go complaining on your behalf without your specific instructions to do so.

Nor will I presume to know what you're thinking or assume that your view is the same as mine. And just because I don't express a view, it doesn't mean I either disagree or agree with you. It doesn't mean I don't have a view. It just means that, for the moment, I'm keeping my thoughts to myself.